명화 읽는 영어수업 11(이것은 파이프가 아니다)

1.

1) It is "This is not a pipe."

2) Magritte wrote "This is not a pipe" to show that the painting isn’t the actual object, but just an image of it. This reminds us that pictures are representations, not the real thing itself.

3) It’s just a picture of a pipe, not a real one. The painting is an image, not a physical object, so it can’t be used like a real pipe.

4) Magritte chose a simple object to make his point clear and easy to understand. By using something ordinary and recognizable, he could show how we often confuse images with reality, even with familiar things.

5) This idea makes us think more critically. We often forget that an image is only a representation, and it's not always a perfect or true version of what we see in real life.

6) Magritte is questioning our automatic trust in visual information. Just because something looks like a pipe doesn’t mean it isa pipe. We need to be more aware and skeptical of what we see.

7) The painting challenges us to think about everyday things, like pictures and language, and ask if we are really understanding them fully or just accepting them at face value.

8) By adding the phrase, Magritte shows that words can also be misleading. The words "This is not a pipe" tell us one thing, but the image shows something else, making us realize that language and images don't always match reality.

9) Yes, it’s asking us to look deeper and question our assumptions. Just because we see something doesn't mean we truly understand it or that it's exactly as it appears.

10) Without the caption, the painting might just look like a normal picture of a pipe. The phrase challenges us to think about the nature of the image and the difference between reality and representation, so without it, the artwork wouldn’t have the same depth.

2. 예시 답안

1) Can language or images ever truly represent reality?

언어와 이미지는 현실을 그대로 재현할 수 있을까요?

Opinion 1: Yes, language and images can represent reality

Language and images are powerful tools humans use to communicate and understand the world around them. Through careful description and detailed visuals, they can capture aspects of reality with great accuracy. For example, scientific language and photographic images help us document facts and events as they are, enabling others to share the same understanding. Although they may not be perfect, language and images serve as effective representations of reality that allow us to convey truth and experience.

Opinion 2: No, language and images can never fully represent reality

Language and images are always limited by human perception and interpretation. Words are abstract symbols that can never completely capture the full complexity of an experience, feeling, or object. Similarly, images are two-dimensional and can only show one perspective at a time. Both are filtered through cultural, personal, and cognitive biases, making them imperfect reflections of reality. Ultimately, reality is far more complex and dynamic than any language or image can fully express.

2) Should art imitate reality, or interpret it?

예술은 현실을 모방해야 할까? 아니면 현실을 해석해야 할까?

Opinion 1: Art should imitate reality

Some believe that art’s primary purpose is to accurately reflect the world as it is. By imitating reality, art can preserve history, document everyday life, and provide a truthful representation that people can recognize and relate to. Realistic art helps viewers see the beauty and complexity of the world in detail, encouraging appreciation and understanding of what truly exists.

Opinion 2: Art should interpret reality

Others argue that art’s true value lies in interpretation rather than imitation. Art allows artists to express emotions, ideas, and perspectives that go beyond mere replication. By interpreting reality, art can reveal deeper truths, challenge perceptions, and inspire new ways of thinking. This creative transformation makes art more meaningful and impactful, as it reflects not only what is seen but also what is felt or imagined.

3) In an age of social media, fake news, and AI-generated images, how

relevant is Magritte’s message today?

현대 미디어 사회, 가짜뉴스, AI이미지 시대에 마그리트의 메시지는 얼마나 적절한

것일까요?

Opinion 1: Magritte’s message is highly relevant today

Magritte’s work, especially his famous painting “The Treachery of Images” (“This is not a pipe”), challenges the relationship between images and reality. In today’s world, where social media spreads manipulated images, fake news, and AI-generated content, his message is more important than ever. It reminds us to question what we see and to be critical of the information presented to us. Magritte’s message warns against taking images and words at face value, urging people to look deeper and seek the truth behind appearances.

Opinion 2: Magritte’s message is less relevant today

While Magritte’s ideas were groundbreaking in questioning reality and representation, the modern media environment has become much more complex. With advanced AI technology and the vast flow of information online, simply questioning images or statements may no longer be enough. People need more than philosophical reflection; they require new tools, media literacy, and fact-checking methods to navigate today’s challenges. In this sense, Magritte’s message is important but might feel limited or outdated in addressing the full scope of modern media issues.